The UK has a rich and successful history of having lay people involved, as lay magistrates, in the judicial decision making of the courts. The tangible benefits of lay magistrates playing a part in the judicial process includes:
There are various requirements of individuals seeking to become lay magistrates. They must be at least 18 and under 65 years old, and live in or near to the justice area where they are going to be appointed. They must also demonstrate six ‘key qualities’: good character; commitment and reliability; social awareness; sound judgement; understanding and communication; maturity and sound temperament.
There are also some restrictions on who can be appointed a magistrate including:
The applicant will require a character reference and undergo two interviews, but there is no guarantee they will be successful as the role is highly sought after. Successful applicants are appointed by the Lord Chancellor on behalf of the Queen, following the recommendations of local advisory committees.
Lay magistrates are required to be in in court for at least 13 days (or 26 half-days) a year. Where a magistrate is employed, their employers must provide their employee with enough time to sit as a lay magistrate. Lay magistrates are entitled to payment of expenses, such as travel and subsidence (though few do claim any costs in practice).
When appointed as a lay magistrate, each new member is assigned to a mentor who oversees their personal development and logs their progress. They receive practical training over several sessions before they sit on the bench for their first case. Training is a continuing process.
New lay magistrates must achieve three basics competencies:
Lay magistrates must retire by the age of 70, at which point they are moved to the supplemental list. They can then undertake minor administrative tasks but cannot sit as a magistrate. The Lord Chancellor is entitled to dismiss any lay magistrate in the following circumstances:
A jury in a criminal trial comprises 12 members of society who hear a criminal case in the Crown Court and decide whether or not the defendant is guilty. The use of a jury in civil trials is restricted and, therefore, rare. Juries are also used in a limited number of inquests held at the Coroners’ Court. Typically, juries in the Coroners Court hear cases of deaths in prison or police custody, industrial accidents or public health: the jury has to decide how someone died.
The benefits of ‘trial by jury’ include:
The jury decides on the facts, while the judge decides on matters of law. Having heard all the evidence for the prosecution and the defence, it is for the jury to decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty. It is for the judge to decide on the appropriate sentence if a guilty verdict is reached.
The jury’s verdict is expected to be unanimous, but after at least two hours of deliberating, a majority of 10 to 2 or 11 to 1 will be accepted by the judge. Under the Juries Act 1974, the foreman of the jury must explain to the court the number of the members agreeing or disagreeing with the verdict. If fewer than 10 agree that the defendant is guilty, and the jury cannot reach a verdict – the jury will be discharged. These cases of a ‘hung jury’ are relatively uncommon. Sometimes a retrial will be ordered.
To serve on a jury a person must:
People are not allowed to become a member of jury in the following circumstances:
In addition, some people have the right to be excused from jury service including:
Once a member of the public has been appointed for jury service, they may ask to be excused. However, they must provide a good reason of why they should be excused from jury service; for example, serious illness or because they have already booked a holiday.
Names are picked by random from the electoral register for the area in which the court is situated. This is done by a computer at the Central Summoning Bureau. At court, the prosecution as well as the defence can challenge the appointment of individual jurors. Even the whole jury panel can be challenged if it is considered to be unrepresentative of the general public, or may be biased. The prosecution may challenge individual jurors without giving a reason, but this right must be used sparingly. Moreover, the judge may discharge any juror whom he thinks lacks capacity to act properly as a juror.
Nicola is a dual qualified journalist and non-practising solicitor. She is a legal journalist, editor and author with more than 20 years' experience writing about the law.
When you submit your details, you'll be in safe hands. Our partners are National Accident Helpline (a brand of National Accident Law, a firm of personal injury solicitors regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority). They are the UK's leading personal injury service. Their friendly legal services advisers will call you to talk about your claim and give you free, no-obligation advice. National Accident Law may pay us a marketing fee for our services.
By submitting your personal data, you agree for your details to be sent to National Accident Law so they can contact you to discuss your claim.
If you win your case, your solicitor's success fee will be taken from the compensation you are awarded - up to a maximum of 25%. Your solicitor will discuss any fees before starting your case.